FOLLOW US

GrindTV Blogs

Enter your email address to receive GrindTV blog updates:

Powered by FeedBurner

Edited by Tom Morin

Edited by Chris Mauro

Edited by Lindsay Fraka

Edited by steve cox

Edited by Teddy Parker

Edited by MORINfocus

Edited by MORINstyle

Edited by Nate Hoppes

Friday, April 30, 2010 11:40am PDT

Dominica's 'Whale Whisperer' shares a remarkable story

By: Pete Thomas, GrindTV.com

Andrew Armour, who runs Kubuli Watersports on the Caribbean island of Dominica, has been called the "Whale Whisperer" because of his ability to communicate with sperm whales, particularly a young male named "Scar."

"Once I'm in the water I try to reach them acoustically by making this noise in the water, and it's the same noise all the time so they know it's me," he says. "So I'm talking to them all the time in the water, and they start coming."

To be sure, had Herman Melville been to Dominica and swum with its whales, he might have had trouble finding the inspiration to write the classic novel, "Moby Dick."

Perhaps 200 of the fabled cetaceans utilize the surrealistically blue realm beyond the island. None has expressed ferocity toward humans or bitten the leg from a tyrannical (and fictional) captain.

On the contrary, as people such as Armour have learned, these great leviathans, once hunted mercilessly around the world, are docile and at times even seem friendly toward people.

"The whales come to us, make friends with us, and interact with us," says Peter G. Allinson, a Baltimore doctor who has made several trips to Dominica, which is between the French islands of Martinique and Guadeloupe.

"The best encounter is when the whales are socializing among themselves and they'll come over and play with us," Allinson adds. "A couple of them will rub up against you and try to get you to rub them, and some of them roll over on their backs and let you rub their bellies. It's quite interesting."

Allinson's images have appeared in National Geographic magazine and won photo contests. He does not distribute his photos but, as a supporter of the Save the Whales organization, he allowed their use for this story hoping it'll raise awareness that all whales "are very intelligent and very friendly animals, and they should not be hunted."

Images captured recently by professional photographers also have surfaced, on various websites, and suddenly the whales of Dominica are no longer a secret.

"The secret is now coming out," Armour says. "And it's coming out in a sense that this is the best place to see sperm whales, this close to North America."

This is disconcerting to scientists, however. They say a budding and largely unregulated "swim-with" program might be harmful to the whales. "These interactions alter the normal daily behavior pattern of not only the animal which is interacted with but also all of its family members as a result," says Shane Gero, a researcher from Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Armour, who closely works with researchers but also runs a whale-watching business, acknowledges that regulations are needed but adds: "My strategy with them has always been to let them want to be with me. The thing is to not let youngsters get too far away from the family group. In this way we have noticed a minimal change in the behavior of the group as a unit."

Sperm whales, which in the pre-whaling era numbered about 1.1 million globally, now number about 360,000. At Dominica, as with other populations, adult females and young whales do not migrate. Adult males visit only during the wintertime breeding season. Young males leave their family units at about age 9 and migrate to the north and south. They do not return to breed until they're much older.

Dominica is unique, Gero says, in that scientists are able to locate specific family units with high regularity. He has been studying the whales there with Hal Whitehead, one of the world's foremost sperm whale authorities.

"Dominica's uniqueness lies in the fact that we can outline families and compare between sisters, as Jane Goodall did with the chimps; not simply between families or like-sounding clans of whales," Gero says. "As a result, our big advancements have been the discoveries of which animals in the family unit acts as babysitter when mother makes deep dives for food.

"We have also been able to compare the vocal repertoires of each individual across the years and have shown that mothers and calves sound different from the other members of the family."

Armour has known Scar since the whale swam to his boat as a calf, with injuries to his head and dorsal fin, presumably caused by marauding pilot whales.

He makes humming and clicking sounds to communicate with Scar, and in January the 10-year-old whale arrived for the first time with some much younger whales.

Scar, who has reached the age where he ought to be off roaming, has not been seen since February.

Says Armour: "Deep down I felt that when he introduced us to the youngsters this January that was his way of saying goodbye."

-- Photos courtesy of Peter G. Allinson. Top photo shows Andrew Armour (left) with a whale named Scar. Bottom images show Jeff Hartog, a plastic surgeon from Orlando, Fla., in the midst of sperm whales. Images are copyrighted and Allinson requests that people respect that protection.

 

Channels: Outdoor

Tags: whales

FEATURED NEWS

Red Bull's floating skatepark left without a permanent home

Red Bull's floating skatepark left without a permanent home

It's difficult to understand why a city with plenty of skateboarders does not have a skatepark

The 28-day, 1,705 mile adventure involving a skatepark floating down the Mississippi River known as Red Bull Mississippi Grind set sail on September 9th culminating with a three day celebration in New Orleans where the final ceremony was dedicated to Red Bull giving the skate structure to the city of New Orleans to help provide a skate park to the city.

All was going according to plan as plenty of guest pros including Luis Tolentino, Joey Brezinski, Ronnie Creager and Converse pro..

43 Comments

 1-20 of 43

aaron kearney

Posted by aaron kearney May 2, 2010 03:06pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

didnt harland williams already do that in "down periscope"? so yeah its already been done =)

jinnlinn

Reply by jinnlinn May 2, 2010 05:39pm PDTReport Abuse

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHRbp6pCzUA

yiko

Reply by yiko May 4, 2010 12:54pm PDTReport Abuse

you all hypocrit racists i think lamb is cute you eat lamb chops me very angry I go now and kill many whales but not eat just look and laugh at my power over these cockroaches of the sea. Northern Blue Fin tuna more rare than whale but no one say a thing for Tuna No you all eat tuna in Japanese Sushi dining house you all devil eyed strangers only take supirior technology from Japan even Toyota is better than any American or European car maker. ME VERY ANGRY NOW HATE WHALE!

the original smo

Posted by the original smo May 2, 2010 03:28pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Awesome... I will still eat a whale if it is the only source of food. But now that we can... Kinda sorta talk to them now, it would be kind like cross species canabilism. but hey food is food. the donner party stuck it out.
And who knows, They might talk to the dolphins and we can all leave the planet.
Thanks for all the fish!

angela smith thompson

Reply by angela smith thompson May 2, 2010 04:04pm PDTReport Abuse

you do know that it has been proven the donner party ate dogs and horses, right? scientists have studied the graves of the group and the animals buried there.

armygrlfrnd

Reply by armygrlfrnd May 2, 2010 08:35pm PDTReport Abuse

you do know that the Donner party was also cannibalistic. Not all members participated, in fact the majority didn't. Even when the supply of dogs and horses and shoes ran out. They preferred to starve to death. Several members admitted to eating the dead. Most of the ones who did resort to cannibalism had mental problems after they were rescued. Most schools don't teach this part of history anymore and you are living proof that it should be taught. I'm not saying that you're stupid, you're just ignorant and need to do more research before you call someone out.

marinebiostudent

Reply by marinebiostudent May 3, 2010 02:43am PDTReport Abuse

Whales are NOT food!!! They're gentle creatures with feelings...
that's why I hate those greedy, heartless, unfeeling and uncaring people who hunt them as food!

chucklesrock

Reply by chucklesrock May 3, 2010 06:42am PDTReport Abuse

So army girl friend you should do some more research yourself. Recent studies prove that the donors were in fact not cannibals but ate only dogs, horses, and even ate deer they somehow managed to hunt from studies of modern day archeology has proven. In fact the discovery channel just did a show showing the proof. Thanks for accusing them of something that science can't prove. No human remains found showed any sign of cutting or tool marks. It was probably a form of hate against them for their beliefs that lead to this story.

wanlife2live

Reply by wanlife2live May 3, 2010 08:34am PDTReport Abuse

Any human remains would have been drug off from the camp by animals. Mrs. Murphy said the wolves were digging up the dead. Patrick Breen wrote in his diary that they were eatting the dead. Archelogy may have provided proof on the remains they had access to, however in 1846
they were a wagon train trapped in Sierra of Neveda with no way out in freezing weather, deep snow and their cattle had been buried in the snow. From Nov 1846-Feb 1847 before the first help arrived. Actual accounts from people who survived and told the story are the foundation of the story itself. Regardless of what Archelogy says on their findings of the remains they examined bottomline is common sense tells you most of the remains were carried off by animals therefore cannot be examined by anyone. It's no mystery that needs to be solved when you have first hand accounts.

Back to the story of the whales I saw "Oceans" yesterday. Beautiful movie and some close up pictures of these beautiful animals. I don't think they should be making a big production about this because it's only going to draw a crowd and before long someone will get stupid and get hurt or killed. If you start interacting with animals like that they start depending on humans and they don't migrate like they are suppose to or wind up injuried by boats.

jascor112

Posted by jascor112 May 2, 2010 03:38pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Outstanding! There is no good reason for hunting whales and the hunting should CEASE ! Humans hunt these magnificent creatures more for greed then anything else, anything the whale can provide, can be provided for elsewhere. No reason to hunt them into extinction. Humans are ignorant of nature and should sit back and learn before its too late.

steven a perry

Reply by steven a perry May 2, 2010 08:48pm PDTReport Abuse

but, you forget that greed money and power over anything and everything is human nature until they eliminate everything or destroy everything in life. you "can not" talk "common since" to greedy and ignorant people that only think of them selfs. we have the knowledge and technology for alternative energy sources, but that would be free energy to too many people and the "greedy won't make any money from it." so they block it because the many won't "stand up" for it and continue too let the few greedy selfish people run the world and control their lives.

yiko

Reply by yiko May 4, 2010 12:51pm PDTReport Abuse

you all hypocrit racists i think lamb is cute you eat lamb chops me very angry I go now and kill many whales but not eat just look and laugh at my power over these cockroaches of the sea. Northern Blue Fin tuna more rare than whale but no one say a thing for Tuna No you all eat tuna in Japanese Sushi dining house you all devil eyed strangers only take supirior technology from Japan even Toyota is better than any American or European car maker. ME VERY ANGRY NOW HATE WHALE!

ehawk7

Posted by ehawk7 May 2, 2010 04:17pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

I'm conflicted. On the one hand, its awesome that this guy has built such an amazing and unique relationship with these whales. IOn the other hand, I'd hate to see the Whales of Dominica turned into some tourist attraction, because that would only ruin their habitat. Cool article, but probably better for the whales if this remained a secret forever.

izzysan

Reply by izzysan May 4, 2010 07:36am PDTReport Abuse

What this article fails to mention is that the in-water interaction is strictly under government permitting and not a "tourist thing" as it is in Tonga and the Silver Banks. Application for an expensive permit does not guarantee you'll get it.

vilma montfort anderson

Reply by vilma montfort anderson May 12, 2010 12:27am PDTReport Abuse

I don't care what people say about this interaction. As long as there are people watching, these whales will stay alive and continue to reproduce. Once they are left alone, someone will think of killing it. Because, unlike the Eskimos that kill only to eat whale meat like they have done for thousands of years, and where a Subway Sandwich can cost over 15.00, they do not sell the meat, and never take more than they need, and NEVER for sale. The meat is distributed among the elderly and poor and then everybody else that wants some. They still go hunting in their kayaks, not like Japan that goes in their supreme ships that kills 1000 whales in the name of RESEARCH! Japan also kills whales in a sanctuary. I always thought that a sanctuary is a place of protection but they do not understand what the word means. I love the Japanese people but I hate the whalers that kill whales in the sanctuary in Antarctica.
And yes, I agree that Toyotas besides the German cars are pretty good.

yiko

Posted by yiko May 2, 2010 04:32pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

I like whale kind animal but I eat whale meet very good tastey part of culture to do why not.

radioactiverebecca

Reply by radioactiverebecca May 2, 2010 04:59pm PDTReport Abuse

Exactly. People eat whale meat for their culture. But, like Jascor said, what whales provide, we can find elswhere. So what of whale meat is good? Chicken's good. Cow's good. Hunting whales isn't necessary. We have so many other sources for food, it's nervewracking.

mukishizzy690

Reply by mukishizzy690 May 2, 2010 05:12pm PDTReport Abuse

You are sick. These animals were not made to eat, I don't care what your culture is. I just don't understand how you could kill such a beautiful, innocent animal and serve it at your dinner table with no remorse. It disgusts me. People need to realize what they're doing to our environment, stop being selfish and make a change that will not only better these animals lives, but ours as well.
I like jascor112's comment. People are extremely ignorant and it's going to affect us as a species one day. It's too bad that people who actually care for the well being of these animals and the environment are going to have to suffer one day because of people like you.
(By the way, next time you leave a comment like this, you should really use an English dictionary and a thesaurus.)

yiko

Reply by yiko May 2, 2010 05:38pm PDTReport Abuse

mukishizzy690 You must be very smart person so I think. So if I write in Japanese you can answer even with dictionary yes. Please respond

markmmajer

Reply by markmmajer May 2, 2010 05:42pm PDTReport Abuse

To mukishizzy: Yiko is from Japan so his English probably isn't perfect. Don't call him out for his grammar. Also, to criticize someone else's culture by calling it ignorant is ignorant in itself. It is not as if the people within the U.S. are perfect.
To radioactiverebecca: Couldn't you also say that what chicken and cows provide can be found elsewhere, i.e. in whale? Why does the whale deserve more protection than anything else, even if its numbers are fewer?
To the both of you, if you are going to care so much for one animal, then you should take the same stance for all animals. I don't though. I'll eat anything; survival of the fittest, so to speak.

phauss

Reply by phauss May 2, 2010 05:54pm PDTReport Abuse

@mukishizzy690

I can't stand your elitism.

"It's too bad that people who actually care for the well being of these animals and the environment are going to have to suffer one day because of people like you."

Why? And as far as international policy is concerned, everything points to outlawing whaling in the first place.

"I just don't understand how you could kill such a beautiful, innocent animal and serve it at your dinner table with no remorse."

You can say the same of any animal. This statement is too broad to be of any significance. Besides, if it's a cultural issue, growing up around people who say it's ok means you'd think it's ok. It's education early on that can fix that.

"...stop being selfish and make a change that will not only better these animals lives, but ours as well."

It has nothing to do with being selfish on his part. Perhaps for the whalers, but would you call someone selfish for enjoying some other meat?

Your arguments are completely blind and only stand to discredit the people you support in the fight against whaling. Your words are loaded, baseless and insulting. Stop whaling, but don't do it by insulting the same people you're trying to convince.

chiru

Reply by chiru May 2, 2010 06:04pm PDTReport Abuse

I really don't care what you choose to eat, but whales are endangered- cows and chickens are not.

I don't see it as a culture clash, but more of a "Let's protect what's left so the whales don't go extinct" sort of thing. Didn't a species of dolphin go extinct just a few years ago? I think we should protect the animals in the world that are actually significant to the ecosystem. Chickens and cows are raised in farms, so they aren't really doing anything except taking up space and causing pollution. (Although, you could probably say the same thing about humans.)

By the way, I asked a bunch of Japanese people about it, and they said that dolphin and whale taste like crap. Obviously, I then asked why they even eat it. They replied, "Because it's a delicacy." Also, I was told that in Japan whale is so expensive that only 1% (might be an exaggeration, but it was definitely single digits) of the population can even afford to eat it. That's not really culture if so little people even do it....

monette

Reply by monette May 2, 2010 06:49pm PDTReport Abuse

We should send him to some canabolistic community and serve him up for dinner, after all its just their culture

waidalee

Reply by waidalee May 2, 2010 06:51pm PDTReport Abuse

To phauss, you remind me of my English professor. =] (And please don' take it as an insult) I do hope that we leave these animals alone. Sometimes I wish people would think what makes us different than every other species in this world. We go chasing and hunting everything. We are like the only species that tries to make every other species a "delicacy". One may argue "Lions do it too!", but they eat what they have to eat. Now that is survival. It's like we can never get enough. People could have steak, chicken or pork chops waiting on their tables, but they must have what's expensive and what they shouldn't have. I'm a Vegetarian, but I won't criticize you if you aren't. I won't think of someone to be "bad" because they eat meat, but to eat something you don't even like is saddening. Believe it or not, every species plays a huge role in this planet. If we keep on eliminating them, it'll backfire. It's already backfiring indirectly. A main source of pollution is meat production and the climate is already changing (I hope no one tries to say it isn't because I'll get annoying with my list of examples lol). My point is... we are already making things bad. What can you possibly gain by making it even worse for another species?

phauss

Reply by phauss May 2, 2010 08:06pm PDTReport Abuse

I don't mean to sound like I'm for whaling at all. I see no point to it and countries that can afford to industrialize it can afford to eat something else.

I wanted to point out the horrible way mukishizzy690 argues against it; it's on the same level of "How would you like it if they do that to you?" First of all, that's an obvious answer. Second, I'd hate to be the chicken living in the cage laying eggs all day. A retort like the one I responded to was immature at best.

If you were presented with someone who, for instance, liked whale meat, there are better things to say than "you're a sick human being and you deserve to die." Way to go, you just made whoever you said that to ignore what you said and he's probably on his way to the store to buy more whale meat.

As I said before, stop whaling, but don't do it by insulting the people you're trying to convince.

junas

Reply by junas May 2, 2010 08:52pm PDTReport Abuse

I totally agree with phauss, I hate ignorant people who are always accusing and cursing other people of what they eat. Even if people eat whale, dog, cat or whatever, it is their choice on what they eat. Animal are made to eat each other.

People, instead of talking mess and crap, you should do something for a change, instead of doing nothing, you should help out an organization to help prevent whale hunting. I am this case, hate whale hunting and whale cruelty, my choice and decision won't change anything, so deal with it people.

bcskillings

Reply by bcskillings May 3, 2010 02:39am PDTReport Abuse

First, Junas, your decision can help, as you can take your advice and support an organization, protest, spread the knowledge, spread your beliefs, sign one (or many) of the petitions out there, and make sure your voice is heard.

Now, I am going to agree with Waidalee. I too am a vegetarian, and unlike other animals, we can make choices on what we eat. We have supermarkets that carry very many options and you can make the conscience decision. What ever you choose, it is your choice, but like I said before, you can let your voice be heard, and like Phauss has said, don't attack them because of their beliefs, then most people will just block you out and not listen to your message. Do so logically.

Now, who are any of us to say that we need to protect one species, just because of how it's population is, but not another, when their population is only so big because they are being forced to breed?

Now for the argument about money and greed, is money worth the suffering, and death when it is not needed, of a creature, of any kind? Think of one of your family members being ill, but treatment being expensive, would you choose money or their life? It is the same with any being, life or money?

Now I am going to finish with two quotes from Mohandas Karamachand Gandhi, hopefully you will be able to see how they relate.

"What kind of victory is it when someone is left defeated?" Not only someone, but something.

"You must be the change you wish to see in the world." This one self explanatory.

james cannon

Reply by james cannon May 3, 2010 09:05am PDTReport Abuse

@bcskillings: I'll bet you are one of those people who don't know where the meat in the meat section of the grocery store comes from (before it goes to the butcher).
@everyone else: Use your brains...humans are instinctive omnivores, this means we eat both animals and plants. That is human nature, like its a lion's nature to eat deer or other animal. So railing on people who are non-vegetarian is kinda dumb. If you can live without meat, good for you. Personally, I find nothing wrong with a big juicy steak or hamburger, or even pork chops. The only reason I see that whaling should end is because they are like the Bison were: an endangered species. And, most of what we can get from a whale can be produced cheaper synthetically.

waidalee

Reply by waidalee May 3, 2010 09:12am PDTReport Abuse

phauss, I agree with you fully. Most of the time, yelling and insulting doesn't quite give good results. =] Most of the time, I convince people in a kindly manner.

czrl

Reply by czrl May 3, 2010 09:50am PDTReport Abuse

@markmmajer Your Questions: Couldn't you also say that what chicken and cows provide can be found elsewhere, i.e. in whale? Why does the whale deserve more protection than anything else, even if its numbers are fewer? The Answers: The whale deserves more protection BECAUSE its numbers are fewer. Its to conserve the species and keep the balance of nature flowing. It is not an animal easily kept and bred in captivity. Chickens, cows & pigs are an easy food source and are not in danger of extinction, so why in the world would people go and catch whales if they are much harder to catch? It is simply unnecessary. Humans can feed of plenty of animals that are not endangered. Survival of the fittest doesn't mean abuse of power. It means SURVIVAL & we can survive off meat & vegetables that can be easily caught and also not over eat (which is also a human tendency, it is a fetish and believe it or not it DOES affect our surroundings and our population- people don't need to be obese to survive).

bullcity

Reply by bullcity May 3, 2010 12:39pm PDTReport Abuse

MarkMMajer,

I agree with you 100%. I love to eat redneck babies. Survival of the fittest, I say! Just like you, I'm all about some moral relativism.

lucy2010

Reply by lucy2010 May 3, 2010 12:58pm PDTReport Abuse

maybe we should start eating the ignorant people who seem to think that the debate here is whether or not we as humans should be eating whale. While I do not agree that whale is a good choice for eating, it's not my place to tell people they shouldn't eat whale. The real problem is that they are more endangered and should be kept living for that sole purpose. To kill something that is needed in the habitat just so someone can have a more tasty meal is ridiculous. This is the reason that the government has taken steps to preserve these mammals.
species population status and listings*
northern right whale 500-1,000 endangered (ESA, IUCN)
southern right whale 3,000 endangered (ESA); vulunerable (IUCN)
bowhead whale 8,000 endangered (ESA, IUCN)
blue whale 10,000-14,000 endangered (ESA, IUCN)
fin whale 120,000-150,000 endangered (ESA); vulnerable (IUCN)
sei whale 50,000 endangered (ESA)
humpback whale 10,000+ endangered (ESA, IUCN)
sperm whale 200,000 endangered (ESA)
vaquita a few hundred endangered (ESA)
baiji about 300 endangered (ESA, IUCN)
Indus susu 500 endangered (ESA, IUCN)
Ganges susu unknown vulnerable (IUCN)
boto unknown; thought to be declining vulnerable (IUCN)
franciscana unknown not listed
tucuxi unknown not listed
Hector's dolphin 3,000-4,000 vulnerable (IUCN)
Indo-Pacific humpbacked dolphin unknown; thought to be depleted not listed
Atlantic humpbacked dolphin unknown, but depleted not listed

I am not an activist, but the whales are extremely important to keeping our ecosystem alive, just like all other living things.

yiko

Reply by yiko May 4, 2010 12:52pm PDTReport Abuse

you all hypocrit racists i think lamb is cute you eat lamb chops me very angry I go now and kill many whales but not eat just look and laugh at my power over these cockroaches of the sea. Northern Blue Fin tuna more rare than whale but no one say a thing for Tuna No you all eat tuna in Japanese Sushi dining house you all devil eyed strangers only take supirior technology from Japan even Toyota is better than any American or European car maker. ME VERY ANGRY NOW HATE WHALE!

mike fontana

Reply by mike fontana May 9, 2010 06:28am PDTReport Abuse

Oh, poor Yiko, it must be terrible to be so angry. Strangely most people who find need to show their power through wasteful examples are most generally doing so out of gigantic insecurity and fear. To compare whales to cockroaches is a sad manifestation of said insecurities. Yiko's fear of his own insignificance is what drives him toward devaluing other creatures and opinions. This doesn't make Yiko bad, in fact, in more ways than not, it makes him more typical. As this seems to be a debate based largely on the questions pertaining to what value we should hold for rare and vanishing components of the echo system, we must also entertain what component certain preferred ignorance plays as a component in this debate.

Leonardo said: there are those who see, there are those who see when shown and there are those who don't see. What Leonardo didn't say is that many of those who don't see aren't' blinded by a dearth of IQ points. They are blinded by their programing and conditioning. They've been blinded by the bad behavior that they've been trained to accept as their highest right and standard. This is a problem inherent in our species. It's as common as eye balls and beating hearts.

Yiko is bolted to his beliefs and attitudes and, in most probability, always will be. There will always be Yikos out there to stand in the way of reason simply because they can. So it has always been and so it most probably will always be. It is our challenge to navigate around the Yikos if we wish to save the whales more than it's Yikos challenge to continue eating them.

In the end, I would like to believe that as the enlightenment and wisdom and awareness grow, the Yikos numbers will dwindle and diminish. Species have always come and gone. Yiko will be among those before the whales.

With sympathy and pity, we should most probably forgive poor Yiko as it is apparent that he hates him self more than he hates whales. In his powerlessness, he fears that he's the cockroach.

phauss

Reply by phauss May 9, 2010 12:01pm PDTReport Abuse

Well that doesn't sound like a very sound statement either. Presuming someone has an insecurity, or presuming a people as a whole has an insecurity, that just sounds like you're trying to find an excuse to blame people. I do agree, however, that his beliefs are pretty solid, and likely won't change completely. But we already mentioned this before:

"Besides, if it's a cultural issue, growing up around people who say it's ok means you'd think it's ok. It's education early on that can fix that."

bcskillings

Reply by bcskillings May 11, 2010 05:45am PDTReport Abuse

@jamescannon, I know where it comes from, that is why I don't eat it. I understand that there are farms other than factory farms, but because of factory farms, and the mistreatment of the animals there, I don't eat meat. It is that simple. Humans are not omnivores by instinct, but because that is how they are fed by their parents, and others of society.

If someone wants to eat meat, fine, but don't torture an animal because of it.

mike fontana

Reply by mike fontana May 11, 2010 06:57am PDTReport Abuse

I'm sorry but, I have to disagree. Everything about our design points to our omnivorous nature, from our dental characteristics to our digestive enzymes. We are designed to chew, tear, cut and digest just about everything put in front of us. Above and beyond all other creatures, by design we are the consummate predator. We are alone on this top rung of the ladder. No creature in the history of this planet has ever been more resourceful in the ways of finding food. Perhaps that will be our undoing but, it's hard to deny that another creature holds a higher link in this chain.

The same brain that drives us to figure out how to eat everything may be something that nature designed into us so that our time here is limited. Nothing lasts forever but, the earth and sky. Even that may be questioned.

In the end our intelligence may be our undoing or,our salvation. I pray for the latter but, even if we do become considerate of all things (and creatures) that we abuse and even if the Yikos of the world find clarity and sensitivity enough to realize that killing a cockroach and whales is ultimately not the same thing, An asteroid on a collision path with us may have the last laugh.

It doesn't matter, Cultures do change. History has proven that many times. Food is often fashion.
Whale as food will hopefully die as did the corset before whales die as a species.

My issues with Yiko don't have so much to do with his bent for blubber. My issues with Yiko revolve around his blind hostility and his lack of humility. When we run from reason we consign ourselves to the darkest, counter productive stupidities.

Sadly, perhaps nature may demand this as part of our shelf life, in that, to be Yiko may be more natural than to be me.

bcskillings

Reply by bcskillings May 11, 2010 07:08am PDTReport Abuse

I see what you are saying, but our bodies are ever evolving. As for our teeth, that is understandable, some vegetables are needed to be chewed. Digestive enzymes, evolution. It could have started in moderation, and evolved so we now have the modern meat eating habits.

Of course this is just a theory, and sadly, these can not be proven do to the lack of history being recorded during these times.

pat56

Posted by pat56 May 2, 2010 04:57pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

http://www.seashepherd.org/

If you truly mean what you say, when you say whales shouldn't be hunted and eaten, help support the ONLY organization to actively prevent illegal Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean Sanctuary. It's been accepted for a while now that whales are actually sentient (INTELLIGENT) creatures, with brains as developed or MORE developed than ours. Don't eat sentient beings! Haven't we grown out of genocide YET? *sigh*

gabgreg

Reply by gabgreg May 2, 2010 05:13pm PDTReport Abuse

no not yet live with it bellyacher

gabgreg

Posted by gabgreg May 2, 2010 05:12pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Why is it ok for scientist to bother or interact with animals or in this case whales but not you or me. they say thier afraid of people making a profit from the whales but are they not profiting from said whales.

mike fontana

Reply by mike fontana May 11, 2010 07:02am PDTReport Abuse

No, I think that the issue is about profiting from sad whales.

ehawk7

Posted by ehawk7 May 2, 2010 05:16pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Is yiko kidding? I'd like to eat people who eat whale meat.

yiko

Reply by yiko May 2, 2010 05:39pm PDTReport Abuse

ehawk7 you eat people really you must be playing silly

waidalee

Reply by waidalee May 2, 2010 06:31pm PDTReport Abuse

You have the best comment here. But I'd suggest not eating them because people like that put anything in their mouths and you'll probably get sick after eating them. Eventually though, with their eating habits and the way they express themselves to people, they'll be gone in no time. =]

markmmajer

Reply by markmmajer May 4, 2010 03:48pm PDTReport Abuse

ehawk apparently thinks that a whale's life is worth more than a human's

ehawk7

Reply by ehawk7 May 4, 2010 04:09pm PDTReport Abuse

depends on the human.

just me

Posted by just me May 2, 2010 05:30pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

It amazes me how big these animals are yet they can interact with humans. To see how graceful and gentle they are is awesome. As far as eating them,, well I guess it's a matter of choice. I don't think they should be killed for food. But, that's just my opinion.

gabgreg

Reply by gabgreg May 2, 2010 06:59pm PDTReport Abuse

I agree

spongetean

Reply by spongetean May 2, 2010 07:29pm PDTReport Abuse

i agree, i've said this before but i love animals!

strobob

Posted by strobob May 2, 2010 06:31pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Using intelligence as an excuse not to eat animals makes no sense as long as we eat pigs which have some of the largest brains in proportion to their bodies. I'm not saying kill whales, I'm just saying.

I guess you can say that whales (the ones that are hunted unlike Sperm whales) are unique creatures. But in fairness, if you're going to make a big issue about Japan or Norway allowing whale hunting, you might as well make a big issue about Canada allowing the harvesting of baby harp seals for fur. Until then, the argument is sustainable harvesting.

Anyway, I agree with the position to leave the whales alone. Respecting animals is to leave them alone in the wild where they belong.

christie anne guinid

Posted by christie anne guinid May 2, 2010 07:14pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

i'd like to swim with whales one day.. :) wana know how much they know..

lazilla

Posted by lazilla May 2, 2010 07:18pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

I had this interesting conversation with some whale the other day, he was upset about the Japanese hunting them and the recent oil spill in the gulf. I told him hey, I don't like it either but Ill do my part and not buy whale parts or use oil anymore. He said that he wished I could do more and didn't understand why I couldn't do more thinking I was the human ambassador to their kind. Oh well... the tuna are also upset and on strike.

spongetean

Posted by spongetean May 2, 2010 07:27pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

i would never hurt an animal, i love animals!
p.s. love the pics!

dahkief

Posted by dahkief May 2, 2010 08:41pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Personally I think that whaling is wrong, but that's not what the main point of this post. What I want to know is what Andrew Armour's noises sound like, I would like to hear a recording of the noises for my self.

eppie billena

Posted by eppie billena May 2, 2010 08:46pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Base to this article and the observations of other scientist these animals with big brains are intelligent and possibly with culture to considering they are like human society.They have baby sitters for their young, and friendly to the puny humans when they are in the water.So it surprise to some that people will even want to hurt this animals.I understand if they live in the Arctic were you can not grow vegetable 365day/year like inthe tropics.And I don't understand the Japanese who hunt and eat Whales,I just wonder how they will feel if their children or them be eaten.It is not like they are starving.

ja18

Posted by ja18 May 2, 2010 10:04pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Thats really great that he can do that it does bring awarness and its helping which is great. I have always been against people killing and eating whales and dolphins. They dont deserve to die they do nothing wrong.

kestra

Posted by kestra May 2, 2010 10:48pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

I believe that whales, as with all diminished species, should be protected as a whole. There is so much that we don't know about them, and it would be a shame to see them go extinct, or any species for that matter.

For those of you who are demanding we take a stand, yes it is needed. More support is needed, and more volunteers are needed. Volunteers, who like you, think something should happen to make whaling illegal, world-wide. However, much more of your time can be spent doing something proactive rather than badmouthing people. It takes action to do action, and sitting at your computers getting an e-tan is not the way to go. Get out in your communities, and contact your representatives.

photonblaster

Posted by photonblaster May 3, 2010 12:03am PDTReply | Report Abuse

Some seem to be missing the obvious point that whales show signs of intelligence, a interest in interacting on some level, form social and family groups, and are exceptional in many other ways. They also have a long time maturing before reproducing. They have been recorded singing and repeating very complex songs. They have a part in a very complex environment we are only beginning to understand. To compare them with barn yard animals hardly does them justice.

Chickens and cows are raised by the truck load with feed provided by people that intend to eat them. They are raised on farms and belong to someone.

Animals in the wild, especially in the seas that belong to us all are not something that these people can lay claim to. Having done nothing to help or create these wild animals means they have no ownership over them. Chickens, and cows are not complex animals living in a complex, natural world. The wild instinct is bred out of them and they a dumb as posts. Also their numbers are easily controlled and it is hardly a problem to increase their numbers if need be.

Sperm whales are harvested for their oil which does have special lubricating properties. Whales have a lot of blubber but I can't honestly say I've ever heard of them as used as a significant food source. Their bones where once used in making ladies under garments, and the oil used to light lamps before electricity.

Considering their long youth before they reproduce and how they have been plundered in the past when greed and ignorance decimated their numbers it would be criminal not to protect them and control their slaughter.

turkey

Reply by turkey May 3, 2010 01:23pm PDTReport Abuse

Chicken and cows are pretty intelligent animals, who have complex behaviors and interact socially, you obviously have never been around farm animals much. Your arguments are bias, Hindu's see the cow as a sacred, majestic and beautiful animal, but I'm not going to stop eating cow because they think that way, so why should I expect the Japanese and Norwegians stop eating whale just because I think a certain way? And Their is no super complex "natural" or "wild" world, its all the same world, cows chickens and humans have just adapted to living in a urban environment. I see no difference in a elephant knocking down trees to create a savanna, than in a human knocking down trees to create a city, humans are just as much a part of nature as any other animal around and just like any other animal they shape the environment to suit their needs as best they can.

mike fontana

Reply by mike fontana May 9, 2010 07:00am PDTReport Abuse

Humans are anomalous. until chickens, cows and whales set up factory farms, it is we who stand outside of natures paradigm.

chadeeflakes

Posted by chadeeflakes May 3, 2010 12:29am PDTReply | Report Abuse

Yeah! it is very awesome and very cool animal. It is pretty amazing to see these creature. I wish I could experience one of those in the future. I hope and I pray that hunting these poor creatures will stop. And those people who hunt these creature will be enlightened.

chadeeflakes

Posted by chadeeflakes May 3, 2010 12:34am PDTReply | Report Abuse

I agree with you photonblaster! Nice one! I hope they have already understand now the importance of the whales.

yiko

Reply by yiko May 4, 2010 12:54pm PDTReport Abuse

you all hypocrit racists i think lamb is cute you eat lamb chops me very angry I go now and kill many whales but not eat just look and laugh at my power over these cockroaches of the sea. Northern Blue Fin tuna more rare than whale but no one say a thing for Tuna No you all eat tuna in Japanese Sushi dining house you all devil eyed strangers only take supirior technology from Japan even Toyota is better than any American or European car maker. ME VERY ANGRY NOW HATE WHALE!

Add a Comment

2000 characters left. 2000 total.