FOLLOW US

GrindTV Blogs

Enter your email address to receive GrindTV blog updates:

Powered by FeedBurner

Edited by Tom Morin

Edited by Chris Mauro

Edited by Lindsay Fraka

Edited by steve cox

Edited by Teddy Parker

Edited by MORINfocus

Edited by MORINstyle

Edited by Nate Hoppes

Monday, August 9, 2010 7:44pm PDT

California great white shark population on the rise, scientist says

By: Pete Thomas, GrindTV.com

"Shark Week" is over but a leading scientist's revelation that great white sharks appear to be growing in number off California is sure to generate more heightened interest in the apex predators -- particularly among swimmers and surfers.

"I think there are more sharks," Christopher Lowe, a professor at Cal State Long Beach and director of the university's Shark Lab, said during an exclusive phone interview. "And that's not a bad thing; it's a good thing."

It's the first declaration by a prominent shark researcher that a recovery of the embattled great white shark -- the world's most notorious predator -- seems to be occurring.

A longstanding statewide ban on fishing for white sharks, an increased survival rate among young white sharks because of fishing gear restrictions, and an expanding sea lion population as a prey source are chief reasons for the comeback.

Lowe, who has performed extensive tagging of juvenile white sharks off Southern California, and has pored over data dating back generations, said personal observations and increased incidental catch rates of small white sharks by commercial fishermen help support his contention. Lowe said he has data to support the steady increase in catch rates since 1994, but could not provide figures while forthcoming a scientific paper on this issue is in review.

Salvador Jorgensen, leader of the white shark research team at Stanford University's Hopkins Marine Station, did not disagree with Lowe's assessment but was more guarded when asked for a response.

"If what we are seeing is truly an increase in the white shark population that would be a relief," Jorgensen said. "Currently we are finding that the total number of adult white sharks along the west coast of North America is much smaller than many people expected."

While the prospect of great whites multiplying off the Golden State might trouble beachgoers, particularly in the middle of summer, Lowe said he does not believe a growing population would result in more attacks on humans.

"The fact that we see so few adult white sharks around populated areas tends to suggest that they don't want to be around places where people are," the scientist said. "People aren't being bumped. People aren't being hit. My guess is that sharks are actually avoiding areas of high human population."

Southern California is a nursery area for juvenile great whites, who feed on small fishes, rays and other sharks during the summer months. Some of these sharks, measuring to about seven feet, are seen each summer by beachgoers.

There have been only eight fatalities attributed to white sharks off California dating to 1926, according to the University of Florida's International Shark Attack File. The last fatality involved an attack by an adult white shark on a swimmer off a northern San Diego County beach in April 2008.

White sharks are found in all major oceans and "red-listed" by the International Union for Conservation of Nature as a globally threatened species. The California Department of Fish and Game banned fishing for white sharks in 1994 because of concern for their survival.

Jorgensen said a joint population study of adult white sharks by Stanford University, U.C. Davis and Montana State University is still under peer review, so he could not volunteer a number. Lowe said his paper, produced with the help of colleagues, contains a compelling argument to support a likely recovery.

Adult great whites congregate each fall near elephant seal rookeries off Central California. A separate population gathers during the same period at remote Guadalupe Island west of Baja California.

Among the threats white sharks have faced globally are trophy hunting for jaws and teeth -- which became widespread after the release of the movie "Jaws" in the mid-1970s -- and commercial fishing for fins and flesh.

It almost seems implausible, in an era during which so many species of sharks are overfished and believed to be in decline, that any species could mount a comeback.

But considering the changing landscape off California, a comeback and its timing make sense. The ban on fishing for white sharks -- for sport or commercially -- was imposed in 1994. That same year, voters approved a measure outlawing the deployment of gillnets within three miles of the California coast.

In Southern California, this zone is where juvenile white sharks spend the summer preying on small fishes, rays and other sharks, before swimming into warmer Mexican waters during the winter.

White sharks are still being caught unintentionally beyond the three-mile mark -- The increase in these captures is what helps support evidence of a comeback -- but those sticking closer to shore are no longer imperiled by the indiscriminate nets, until they venture into Mexican waters.

Adult white sharks, meanwhile, now have a seemingly endless bounty of sea lions on which to prey, along with the elephant seals they prefer.

Sea lions, once routinely slaughtered by fishermen, were spared under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. Ten years later, their population was estimated at 145,000 in a range from the Sea of Cortez within Mexico to British Columbia, Canada, with only 50,000 in the Southern California Bight.

According to the most recent National Marine Fisheries Service estimate, there there are at least 238,000 sea lions in U.S. waters, the majority of which reside off Southern California.

"So if you add those two things together, you've got a restored forage base for the adults and you've got better survivorship of the pups," Lowe said. "So what we think we're seeing from the fishery catch data and some of the other anecdotal pieces, is the actual recovery of the white shark population."

The biologist added that while Southern Californians should not expect a spike in shark attacks on humans, those who spend lots of time in or near the ocean might witness more sea lions with bite marks, and more surface attacks by white sharks on the pinnipeds.

"I think the white shark population is going to do what it's supposed to do: help regulate marine mammal populations," Lowe said, explaining that apex predators play a vital role in maintaining a healthy marine ecosystem.

To be sure, fishermen whose livelihoods are threatened by pesky sea lions, which decimate catches and destroy gear, will cheer alongside marine conservation groups for more signs of a white shark comeback.

Swimmers and surfers? They're probably not so enthusiastic.

-- Images courtesy of Christy Fisher / Sharkdiver.com

FEATURED NEWS

Surfer Julian Wilson Joins Livestrong in Fight Against Breastcancer

Surfer Julian Wilson Joins Livestrong in Fight Against Breastcancer

Julian, whose mom battled breast cancer when he was five, has been a big advocate of breast cancer awareness over the years

Pro surfer Julian Wilson joins an impressive list of athletes on Nike's Livestrong team to raise awareness for cancer.

Julian, whose mom battled breast cancer when he was five, has been a big advocate of breast cancer awareness over the years.

"I was just a kid when she got diagnosed and I didn't understand what my mum went through and how scary it was until I got older. Given my position, it's easy for me to give a bit back and I enjoy doing it," says Wilson who..

6 Comments

 1-6 of 6

katmar1

Posted by katmar1 August 11, 2010 08:14pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

this is awesome!!! :D You go Bruce!

ckire_

Posted by ckire_ August 11, 2010 11:41pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

This is a fact! Generally, the prevailing GLOBAL warming is actually beneficial to marine ecosystem except to some instances like in coral bleaching of coralline habitat near the coastline areas. Here in the Pacific, fish catch usually peaks during summer or when the weather is warm. Most fishers likewise often encounter sharks, dolphins, whales and other member of the Pinnepeds group during these periods.

jenna henry

Reply by jenna henry August 25, 2010 10:48pm PDTReport Abuse

too much algae can also decimate dissolved oxygen levels in the water and create dead zones. 1) warm water holds less dissolved oxygen than cool or cold water, and 2) oxygen demand is greater in warm water than in cold water. certain fish must have certain dissolved oxygen levels, and some are more sensitive than others. be careful when making such sweeping generalizations, because it may not be true for all. and when you say fact, remember that a fact is a theory that has yet to be disproved by research suggesting otherwise, and is agreed to be true by the large majority of the scientific community. if it's still debated, it's not fact.

you might also be thinking of a process called upwelling, when colder, nutrient-rich waters are forced upward from the deeper reaches of the ocean, which causes feeding frenzies. this is a natural occurrence and shouldn't be compared to the effects of global warming on ocean ecosystem functions.

ckire_

Reply by ckire_ August 26, 2010 05:17am PDTReport Abuse

Thanks for that wonderful explanation jenna and I appreciate you for trying to correct my statement. Yeah you're right but i just wanna have some things to clarify too;
The effect of Global warming has something to do with heating up the ocean and so with "upwelling" through its greenhouse effect. Yeah upwelling is a natural occurrence but due to enhance greenhouse effect, the marine environment is exposed to extreme water conditions more than the usual and this is not normal.

Exactly, you are right with the relationship between temperature and DO. Dissolve oxygen however, can be produce through photosynthesis by phytoplankton and some bacteria present in the water column and this can make DO available. But circumstances are, too much algae can decimate DO levels and may even deplete DO levels during algal bloom or phytoplankton die-off. My point is, if there would be enough phytoplankton in the water which 'may be' enhanced through GW - then it would attract plankton eater marine fishes to go along these areas for food.

I would also like to express my apology when you think i want to generalize my statement but that's not what I mean. Im referring to the effect of global warming to the pelagic environment in general. Yeah, I should have refrained from using it as general.

jenna henry

Reply by jenna henry August 26, 2010 01:18pm PDTReport Abuse

No worries - I just get concerned whenever the term fact is used, because facts are so rare in science, and the scientific process is not perfect or fool-proof. When discussing a major issue such as global warming I believe it's important to keep perspectives open to correction and discussion. This is not to say that your statement about global warming having positive effects on marine ecosystems is incorrect, but should be kept open for debate.

Regarding upwelling, this is a natural occurrence which happens due to several different forces, and mostly they are wind, topographic forces, or eddies in the water. Let's be clear in our understanding that warmer waters are unable to provide many nutrients on a large scale because their dissolved oxygen levels are incapable of doing such. It is when the colder waters rise to the surface and provide those nutrients that the productive activity occurs - this is most notably prevalent in the coastal areas on which more than 20% of global fisheries are dependent. This being said, your theory could be possible if warmer temperatures gave way to the development of major storms which would in turn cause upwelling from the forces of the wind. The ocean simply warming at the surface causing an increase in algae and phytoplankton resulting in increased productivity would be a bit more difficult to achieve, I think, because warmed surface waters are subject to transpiration and are carried onto land in the form of precipitation. As such, I believe it would be difficult for those warmed waters to remain on the surface long enough to cause significant increases in productivity as speculated.

Also, I believe it'd be important to distinguish which areas you're referring to. The pelagic zone is the top most layer in the water column, but this is the case for the entire ocean. If referring to the coastal areas where water tends to be warmer and supportive of reef areas, nurseries, etc., then it may be possible.

ckire_

Reply by ckire_ August 26, 2010 08:53pm PDTReport Abuse

ok jenna, i think we're on the same boat. i just intentionally neglected to indicate how is upwelling happened in my statement because i believe you know that in your case. Its not that the ocean is warm so upwelling can be done - it could be due to the effect of other environmental factors as what you have stated but Im referring more on the sudden change of temperature when a heavy downpour occur in warm upper layer of the ocean - and that's when upwelling gave way to increased productivity in the water.

I think the water is clear, and I hope that we will have another warm and cool discussion which brings upwelling of useful information. Thanks jenna and may we have a productive environment!

Guys I would also want to say that this is not to have promotional campaign for global warming. The phenomenon must be mitigated and prevented because in the long run, it will threaten the existence of human and other living resources.

ckire_

Posted by ckire_ August 11, 2010 11:58pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

GLOBAL warming enhances marine biodiversity due to enhanced natural food production such as algae and diatoms at the surface of the ocean or at least within the epipelagic zone - which attracts pelagic fishes - which in turn attract larger predators including sharks.

maria salers

Posted by maria salers August 12, 2010 04:38pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

AHHHH, GREAT FOR NATURE

ehawk7

Posted by ehawk7 August 16, 2010 03:05pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

good news...unless you're a surfer.

jeff phillips

Posted by jeff phillips August 18, 2010 09:33pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

If it is the case and the signs are right - then this a great sign!!!

Add a Comment

2000 characters left. 2000 total.