Yesterday Channel Islands Surfboards posted an interview with team rider Bobby Martinez about life, his career, and future plans. The Santa Barbara native has been very vocal about his feelings towards the ASP via broken english twitter posts, and has the fines to show for it. Below is an excerpt from the interview, and you can read the whole enchilada over here. Today the ASP's Dave Prodan issued a response. Read that below the interview.

TL: You missed the J-Bay event; do you plan on doing Tahiti?

BM: No, I am not going to do the Chopes event. I love Tahiti and that wave; I just don't like being there for an event with everyone there.

TL: Where do you actually stand in regards to the tour and its contests?

BM: Yeah, I am not too concerned about the contests. I'm not going to go to Tahiti anymore.

TL: But you won there twice and you stand a good chance to win a good amount of money. Are you seriously not going?

BM: It's not about the money, I had big contracts and was making great money but I wasn't happy. I would rather just be home and surf around here.

TL: So is it the new tour that has you fired up?

BM: Yes. I just don't agree with the halfway cut. Not only do those surfers that come on at the halfway point have no chance of winning a world title, which is pointless, but they barely get a taste of it and then they will probably fall right off it. Everyone deserves a whole year. I think it takes at least a year to really figure it out.

TL: Are there other reasons?

BM: Oh yeah, I have a bunch. They said cutting it down to 32 means it would only take 3 days to run an event but I think it still takes 4 days anyway now. I think we need to be judged within our own ranks. You have an A+ tour(WCT) and you have a B+ tour (WQS). The A+ guys lose to the best guys in the world. Take Freddy P and myself for example, we lose to the best and aren't re-qualifying as of now, but other surfers that aren't on the WCT tour are surfing against 'QS guys and are qualifying. I just think they should surf against themselves, keep it separate and the top guys get to come on tour. This year I've lost to Taj and Jordy, some of the best guys in the world and that's fine if I don't re-qualify. I can live with that, but who do they lose to? The One World ranking is just wrong. That's why I hate it.

And here's the ASP's response:

Well, we're obviously disappointed that it looks like Bobby won't be on tour much longer. I think he's universally regarded as one of the most technically proficient surfers on the planet. People often comment on the strength of his backhand (which is well warranted), but he has also scalped four elite tour events on his forehand (two at Mundaka and two at Teahupo'o) so he was incredibly well-rounded. That said, it's become obvious that Bobby hasn't been happy for a while now, and we would never force anyone to do the tour if their heart wasn't in it.

I think it's important to note that the interview did cite that the changes to the tour were actually tabled and voted on by the surfers themselves - this is something that often gets lost on the fans and even some of the surfers. We, the ASP, act as stewards for the tour and do our best to guide the direction of it, but at the end of the day, the changes are voted on by the surfers themselves. I don't envy the job of the surfers' representatives, but I do know that they work tirelessly to ensure that every surfer's voice is heard and I'm confident that they had reached out to and attempted to engage Bobby in discussion on these changes. It's unfortunate that he feels misrepresented by the surfers' union in this matter.

As noted in the interview, Bobby's gone through a negative period in his life over the past two years or so, and that's certainly been evident in his results. He started 2010 very strong with back-to-back Equal 3rds on the Gold Coast and at Bells, but then only managed to make four heats throughout the remainder of the year. During that time, he did few if any Prime or Star events to back himself up, despite the ASP World Rankings and tour changes having been announced at the end of 2009. When the season started this year, he faced an uphill battle, but has managed show signs of improvement with a 13th at Bells and a 5th in Rio. However, as with 2010, he hasn't been able to produce a significant result in the Prime or Star events and still needed to record strong finishes in J-Bay, Tahiti and New York to ensure he remained with us after the September rotation. It's disappointing that he's decided to quit instead of take a crack at it as Jeffreys and Tahiti are two of his strongest events, and with minimal effort, he could have been safe for the September rotation.

When all's said and done though, Bobby has been traveling the world nearly 15 years now and we absolutely respect his decision to want to stay home and have a family. We wish him nothing but luck in his future endeavors and we're thankful for the inspiration he gave and the performances he locked in while amongst the world's elite. With his departure from the Billabong Pro Tahiti, Travis Logie will take his spot and it looks like we're going to have pumping surf for the waiting period. It will be awesome to see the world's best surfers challenged with some heavy surf this coming week.

Dave Prodan
International Media Director
ASP International

Kelly Slater's appearance at the Quiksilver Pro last month was hardly surprising given his Quiksilver obligations. But with the ASP circus now down in Torquay for the Rip Curl Pro it's time to ask some pressing questions.

But first, a quick review: Slater has been threatening retirement for years. Then last year he rocked a the ASP to its core by threatening to start a rebel tour if the ASP didn't clean up its act. The ASP (ultimately controlled by Quiksilver, Billabong and Rip Curl) did its best to respond. Depending on who you talk to, they've made modest improvements.

So what's Kelly up to now? Why bother with the ASP tour this year after all the crap he took last season? It couldn't have been easy on him. Slater was getting the short end of most of the judging sticks while watching Mick and Joel battle for the title. Meanwhile, he was getting excoriated by his peers for trying to blow up a system -- broken or not -- that's been in place for 30 years. He certainly doesn't need the abuse at this stage in his career.

Why not just walk away? Why bother coming to Bells? What's the motivation? Well, we thought we'd ask Mr. Slater these questions knowing full well that, while he's always very gracious to the press, you're going to need a bit of a hammer to get past his armor. So we sent Mr. Slater some pointed questions via email and he was kind enough to respond from Bells...

1. GTV: Why, exactly, are you at Bells?
Kelly Slater: Great golf and Easter parties down here.

2. Which of the following is closest to your primary motivation for donning a jersey these days...
A. Proving equipment theories.
That's fun when it works out and probably the best arena to do it in once you have it sorted out.

B. Battling young guns.
That's a good challenge and it's fun to watch em surf.

C. What else am I going to do?
This is where the beat surfing happens. If the waves were always good on it I would never question being anywhere else.

D. I have to stay in the game to keep hopes of another tour alive.
Seriously?

Hmm... It seems he took a little offense to our last question, but hey, we had to ask. We thank Mr. Slater for his rapid response. We would now would encourage you to read between the lines in search of his true meaning.

In an email to Justin Cote, Channel Islands team manager, Travis Lee, explains the theory and how this revolutionary board came about. I've been saying this for years, that there has to be a way to ride shorter boards at spots like Pipe. Now, I'm not saying what I thought of is exactly like Slater's "Deep Six," it was similar, I was going to call it the "Big Barrel Chode." You know like a fishy board with a semi-gun's pulled-in tail.

Here's what Travis Lee had to say:

"Kelly Slater's "Deep Six" board ridden to victory in the 2008 Pipeline Masters is a result of Al Merrick's pursuit to place surfboard design in the hands of surfers themselves. Kelly worked with Channel Islands' CAD software and library of designs to marry a 7' 0' K-step and a 6' 0' K-board (tangent?) into a completely original 5'11" with the wide point pushed forward. Once our in house CNC machine milled the blank based on Kelly's specs, he walked the board over to Al's shaping room to have him put his finishing touches on the Deep Six. This 5'11" x "18 1/2 x " 2 1/2 round pin enabled Kelly to get into the hollow waves earlier and deeper allowing for adjustments that only a shorter board can provide. The Deep Six is the latest in Kelly's quest to ride boards shorter than normally thought possible in surf conditions all over the world."