Thursday, September 9, 2010 4:40pm PDT

Angler's amazing feat: 1,000 species of fish and counting

By: Pete Thomas, GrindTV.com

Steve Wozniak is arguably the world's most prolific fisherman, having recently attained a milestone that probably will never be matched: 1,000 species of fish landed via rod and reel, after visits to 63 countries and 37 U.S. states, and flying more than one million miles.

"Actually, I'm up to 1,008 now," said the Northern Californian software company executive, acknowledging that what began as a casual hobby several years ago "has become a twisted obsession."

The 1,000-species mark was obtained when he reeled in a small, nondescript coalfish off Norway.

"Early on I thought the 1,000th fish would be something exciting like a giant blue marlin in Aruba, but it just happened to be a coalfish," he said.

Wozniak, 47, who travels extensively on business, devoted practically all spare time during his travels to employ local guides and target new species on the quest to reach 1,000.

He used traditional tackle to catch common game fish such as marlin, tuna, grouper, halibut, trout and perch. But he used extraordinarily light line and miniscule hooks to lure some of the smaller, truly obscure denizens from the depths of oceans rivers, lakes, "and everything in between, including hotel fountains," he joked.

He released the majority of fish for the sake of conservation, after they were photographed.

Among exceptions was a large moray eel that exploded in a fit of rage after being hauled aboard the chartered boat off Portugal. Wozniak and John the guide leaped onto deck chairs while letting "El Diablo" the eel wear itself out enough to be safely dealt with.

"So John and I stood bravely on the chairs, like brave 9-year old girls bravely avoiding savage mice," Wozniak wrote afterward on his blog.

Among his strangest catches are an evil-eyed puffer caught on a river in South Africa, and something called a sarcastic fringehead, tiny but "pound for pound the meanest fish in the universe," landed off Central California.

If it ends with the word "fish," Wozniak probably caught one. On his list are sailfish, monkfish, wolffish, treefish, soapfish, parrotfish, porkfish, lionfish, catfish, roosterfish, triggerfish, redfish, goatfish and so on.

Also in his logbook of catches are striped bass, steelhead, cod, tuna, salmon, pompano, shark, and dozens of species people might not have heard of, including a clown featherback, a klipfish, a spotted wobbegong and a rock cale.

During his travels Wozniak also set 15 International Game Fish Assn. world records, mostly involving species that had not previously been caught and submitted for record consideration by the IGFA.

Wozniak's longest battle was five hours with light line against a 251-pound tuna. His most cherished catch was that of an Atlantic salmon because he had launched numerous unsuccessful campaigns before finally logging the catch off Northern Ireland.

The IGFA does not recognize the number of species an angler catches, but verified Wozniak's 15 world-record catches. Wozniak, an IGFA member, says he has photographic evidence of every catch and, in most cases, he has guides as witnesses.

Only one known person has come close to matching Wozniak's feat: Patrick Sebile, a lure manufacturer and an IGFA representative, recently logged the capture of his 600th species.But with Wozniak still feeding his obsession -- he's trying to arrange a trip to remote Eastern European waters -- he'll be next to impossible to catch.

Other popular stories on Yahoo!:
Rare blue diamond expected to fetch $15 million at auction
Video: Goalie's extremely costly celebration
Photos: Cameron Diaz among models turned A-list actresses

-- Photos: Steve Wozniak (top left) poses with a Pacific sailfish caught off Costa Rica; a treefish landed off Santa Barbara, Calif. (middle), and a bluewing gurnard bagged off Botany Bay, Australia.

FEATURED NEWS

Grand Canyon bans sales of bottled water in new NPS plan

Grand Canyon bans sales of bottled water in new NPS plan

The ban on less-than-one-gallon bottles and different kinds of boxes is aimed at eliminating the single biggest source of litter in the park

It was ugly. It was public. And it involved controversy over whose park it is anyway, Coca-Cola's or ours, but in a plan just approved by John Wessels, National Park Service Intermountain Regional director, Grand Canyon National Park will end the sale of water sold in disposable bottles within 30 days. The park has free water stations available where visitors can fill reusable water containers.

The ban on less-than-one-gallon bottles and different kinds of boxes is aimed at..

30 Comments

 1-20 of 30

juked

Posted by juked September 11, 2010 02:14pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

WoW in real life! Salty Wozniak!

kikkin

Reply by kikkin September 11, 2010 05:37pm PDTReport Abuse

I might be the only person to get that! :P
Kikkin

divinagracia

Reply by divinagracia September 12, 2010 02:36am PDTReport Abuse

hi! im divine a filipino im interested to be your friend. . .u can keep on touch on me at my FB acct divz_0418@yahoo.com. . ..

shabbir asar

Reply by shabbir asar September 13, 2010 01:08am PDTReport Abuse

http://www.wowhead.com/achievement=1516

Pro

ryan masanguid

Reply by ryan masanguid September 13, 2010 05:18am PDTReport Abuse

hi guys im a loner Filipino guy looking forward for a friends,,,,,just add me in my Facebook account......guy, girl, gay what ever u r! u r welcome to me........see u guys...Godblessssssssss

gerald backus

Posted by gerald backus September 11, 2010 02:23pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Fishing is torturous for marine animals.

snapgage

Reply by snapgage September 11, 2010 04:04pm PDTReport Abuse

yeah........sure, tell that to yourself wussy

felino jr demeterio

Reply by felino jr demeterio September 11, 2010 04:19pm PDTReport Abuse

aren't you eating fish? how about other animals that are turned into meat, like pork, is it torturous too?

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 11, 2010 04:49pm PDTReport Abuse

Not torturous for hogs or cattle, they come in a building up a walkway like they always do, into a narrow passageway like always, calm and easy. Then an air powered 1" steel rod is rammed through the top of their head from a hand held air hammer. Instantly dead, no thrashing around. If an animal is allowed to thrash and kick and linger to die, his body releases hormones into the meat, that make it taste bad on serving. No commercial factory wants that to happen, bad for business and taste. Even fish that are caught commercially or raised in ponds, are treated quickly for the same reason.

kaseylj

Reply by kaseylj September 11, 2010 05:14pm PDTReport Abuse

Bill, you obviously don't know very much about factory farming or slaughter houses. I think this video will clarify some things for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIjanhKqVC4

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 11, 2010 05:28pm PDTReport Abuse

Kasey, you are right, Ive not been in one since i worked in one in junior high for a couple of summers, chicken houses in the summer in high school. We did it as i said then and didnt have cameras and didnt figure it was worth fliming.

But how they do it now, I dont know. This looks like a really big outfit, way larger than where I worked! If there is a better way than I knew, or than your movie, then maybe someone will post it for us. Sounded like a movie with an emotional message and not just a plain documentary. Im 65 now and retired and dont frequent slaughter houses. Regards,

gerald backus

Reply by gerald backus September 11, 2010 05:28pm PDTReport Abuse

Ideally ranches and farms are created as a more humane habitat, than wilderness for animals, where they are protected from fangs and claws of carnivorous animals and from harsh weather conditions. When they are slaughtered rightly, they feel no pain.

I recommend the movie "Fast Food Nation" for more depth into farmed meat industry.

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 11, 2010 05:34pm PDTReport Abuse

Geralds description is what Ive experienced. Kinda like when I go hunting. I dont do like some hunters and just shoot an animal anywhere I can get a hit. If I dont do a solid head shot, I dont shoot. I figure I owe that to the critter. Some hunters shoot an animal anywhere, and then have to track it for hours, then they come home and complain about how "gamey" it tastes!! DUUUHHHHH!!! Wonder who caused that? You dont see restaurants serving meat from an animal that was chased over hill and dale for hours, then killed. If so, you could taste it at your plate! However, your mileage may vary. Regards

kellyc

Reply by kellyc September 11, 2010 07:50pm PDTReport Abuse

Kasey,

the minute you link a PETA video, people know how idiotic and brain washed you are.

www.petakillsanimals.

Your "amazing" (read: terrorist) group kills more animals a year than it claims to save.

kellyc

Reply by kellyc September 11, 2010 07:51pm PDTReport Abuse

Bill,

Don't worry about it. It has been proven that the "abusers" in that video are actually PETA Members ;)

hammer2112

Reply by hammer2112 September 11, 2010 10:12pm PDTReport Abuse

Bill,
A head shot? Are you serious? Please take a hunter education course. The only acceptable kill shot is to the lungs, and will drop a deer almost where it stands if placed correctly.

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 11, 2010 11:43pm PDTReport Abuse

No why would you suggest that I need to do a silly thing like that? If I limit myself to those shots where I can connect on the head, what advantage would a lung shot be, and why would it be quicker in killing? Please explain that one. And who is it that decides whats acceptable or not and recommends lung shots? Mostly folks who cant hit heads. Ive seen body shots, and lung shots that wind up letting a deer kick around for a bit, or run some distance, but never seen a head shot fail to kill instantly. If you put a 308 or 4570 through the head, its surely dead right there. Same thing with varmit shooting or squirrel hunting. A head shot Ive never seen to fail. I have done a neck shot through the bone when thats all I had or a backbone shot across the hips from 90 degrees severing the back bone, but only when the rest of the deer was hidden. That wont kill him, but hes not going anywhere else, then I walked up and did a final up close. I worked with several guys before retiring, who killed lots more deer than I did, and considered most any kind of shot ok if they could get the deer even if they had to track him a ways, but not me. Im tender when it comes to critters and want kills to be quick and as painless as possible. Regards

gerald backus

Reply by gerald backus September 12, 2010 12:29am PDTReport Abuse

I hope that one day humankind will make the permanent shift from hunting/fishing to farming/domesticating. Even farming in my opinion first and foremost should be for a more peaceful and secure habitat for the animals. When we stop seeing animals purely for exploitation I think that will mean something about our civilization.

berws

Reply by berws September 12, 2010 03:36am PDTReport Abuse

Hi Mr Strickland...How can you be tender if you still have the desire to kill a animal?!

michaels

Reply by michaels September 12, 2010 06:52am PDTReport Abuse

Basic Butchery 101: The best way to eliminate that 'gamey' flavor that wild meat sometimes takes on is to get as much blood out of the animal as you can. If you look at a good cut of pork, you will notice that it is not red, nor is it completely pale, almost like a piece of halibut. With beef it's a little different, since that meat naturally tends to be more red in color. The easiest way to get the meat from any animal is to stun the animal, then cut it's throat to allow the blood to be pumped out while the heart is still beating. Now, this may not be viewed as humane, but this is what the meat-demanding public desires. With wild game, stunning the animal is not possible. So, we tend to shoot them in the lungs, which is fatal to the animal in just a short time, but leaves the heart beating to get the blood drained from the muscles. Again, this might be viewed as being the most hmane, but it's the best way to ensure meat quality. End of class.

steve brueske

Reply by steve brueske September 12, 2010 07:25am PDTReport Abuse

I'm sorry, but i don't see how cattle farming and chicken coops are humane in the least. I know things were different on the humane and sanitary level when Mr. Strickland worked them, but now in a world of massive demand the product is shoved into such tight areas that humane is far from a logical name. When a free range tag is allowed to be put on a product as long as the gate is open for at least 5 minutes a day regardless of any on the animals being out, we are simply attempting at hiding ourselves from the truth. Now I do understand the necessity of the structure, and with large changes country wide, the system would collapse. But I feel that we shouldn't blindfold ourselves from the truth. If your life were in danger, (we can die any day from any accident) would you prefer to be stuffed shoulder to shoulder and ass to chest with tens, hundreds, or thousands of other people until you had a rod shoved through your head, or your neck was corked (What they used to do with pigs)?

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 12, 2010 09:18am PDTReport Abuse

Gerald I believe animals are here for us to use for our good. The Bible gives rules of how a man is to use animals but to be considerate of them. And hunting/fishing lets them be free until we get hungry. If you raise them on a ranch or at home, I dont see a problem with that either if they are treated well. I have no problem with hunting at all and dont see why anyone would. And killing with a bullet or ram, is the same to me if done quickly and cleanly.

Berws, I dont have an innate desire to kill things but like most folks, want to eat. The point I tried to make is, if we continue to eat them, I want the killing to be as swift as possible. If you've a positive suggestion in how this can be done in a more tender manner, either in the wild or in captivity, Id like to hear it.

Michaels, I guess I flunked the class. But you flunked mine to, so I guess we are even on that one. Class dismissed.

Steve, I dont know what cattle farming means, is that ranching? And I didnt mention coops, dont know where that came from either. I didnt mention them. Your rendition of farming and chicken coops Im totally unfamiliar with, so I cant comment either way on what you have to say here. All my relatives who have animals, and my neighbors living by me on 3 sides now, raise them almost as friendly pets, letting them run about as they please all day long and nite too, pet them when they go to the pasture and feed them treats at times as well as daily in a food bin. I have no idea what you mean about a range tag, none of them wear tags. The ones Ive seen killed are penned up at a slaughter house for one day, go through lanes like they did daily to be fed or milked with no upsetting warning of the killing scene so there is no trauma. Aparently the way you kill animals for food is different than mine or maybe you dont eat meat. Thanks for everyones input, Im learning about things outside my back yard! Regards

greg bieniek

Reply by greg bieniek September 12, 2010 09:18am PDTReport Abuse

Who gives a shit what some tree hugging queer thinks about fishing. It is natural selection HUMANS ARE PREDATORS!!! There are many in nature Bears, Monkeys, Loins, tigers, oh my; The list goes on and on our eyes are forward like all predators and FISH TASTE GOOD!!! so next time this queer eats a carrot just think how cruel it was when the poor thing was chillin in the ground then illegal immigrant just ripped it out of the ground..... FAG

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 12, 2010 10:02am PDTReport Abuse

HA HA!!! Many thanks Greg!! I salute you!! Watch out for the chain saw, tree hugger, its coming your way. And in Louisanr, if you aint fishing, you are about to be the bait!!---On the tree hugger note---Ive a friend in the timber business here who has 345 guys in the woods cutting timber every day. Now if you have any idea how many trees that is, its a LOT!! He also has a tree planting crew. IN the balance of it all, there is more timbered land in Alabama today than there was in 1930-2009. Its growing every day. More trees than they can cut and they arent the only teams in the state. Timber is BIG business, so all these tree huggers can buy food in packages and wipe their asses. GO GREG!!

jody anderson

Reply by jody anderson September 12, 2010 10:08am PDTReport Abuse

peta kills animals?????- what are you thinking- and greg- you complete jerk- its not natural selection when we kill and wipe out this much life on this planet- i feel sorry for all the animals you idiotic morons kill- oh and this article is stupid- some idiotic fisherman killing tons of rare and beautiful fish.

jody anderson

Reply by jody anderson September 12, 2010 10:11am PDTReport Abuse

bill - another moron- i highly doubt that there are more trees now in Alabama than in 1930-2009. Even if that is true- what about the rain forest.

gerald backus

Reply by gerald backus September 12, 2010 10:55am PDTReport Abuse

It is my opinion that cattle farming today is more humane than in the past. I know that we often hear about the aspects, which strongly need to be improved, but if we compare what we have today with feudalism or other more despotic farming traditions, we will see a big difference. In former, more brutal and barbaric times, when individual families and peasants were responsible for domesticating animals, it was far more difficult to monitor the conditions for animals and their treatment. It was nearly impossible to control animal disease and suffering on a large scale. In some parts of the world uncivilized people cut of limbs of animals while they were still alive and ate them. They kept animals alive to preserve their other limbs. Modern farming techniques allow for more supervision of animal domestication and for improvement of animals' condition overall. Is it wise to leave the responsibility for animals in the hands of private, often uneducated folk, to the unpredictable wilds of nature or is it wiser to somehow move toward intelligently improving animal conditons on a large scale? Who will do it if the industrial farmers do not? Probably nobody because it is a lot of work.

I agree that much work needs to be done to continue improving animals' conditions and livelyhood. I believe that even in a farming environment, first and foremost the happiness and security of the animals is relevant. I say that farms should become more like animal habitats.

Otherwise humans' attitudes toward animals and towards living beings in general remains exploitative. Otherwise the hunt and exploit mentality prevails. Yes the Bible states that people can eat meat, but remember the story of Cain and Abel. Who did God bless?

jody anderson

Reply by jody anderson September 12, 2010 11:46am PDTReport Abuse

greg- you're opinion is wrong it is not more humane if anything less. the slaughterhouses are cruel and evil- many animals now never see the light of day. but i agree with the rest of your comment.

michaels

Reply by michaels September 12, 2010 12:43pm PDTReport Abuse

Whatever, bill...whatever. Some people are just too old to teach...

quantum ranger

Reply by quantum ranger September 12, 2010 01:39pm PDTReport Abuse

Long post is Looooooooong

dtzulu

Reply by dtzulu September 12, 2010 02:05pm PDTReport Abuse

He doesn't "Kill tons of of rare and beautiful fish" Jody. He catches and releases them. Get past your slant on people who do eat as humans were designed to and read the entire story.

toni lawrence

Reply by toni lawrence September 12, 2010 08:22pm PDTReport Abuse

Did you know that now you need to be certified to be able to handle pigs destined for the slaughter house, even the drivers, it is called the PQA Certificate, the pork quality assurance because some nitwit found that stress will do something to the meat of a hog, so those piggies are BABIED to the slaughterhouse, and how do I know...I am certified to transport them to slaughter and the tests (yes i said tests) are not easy.

jody anderson

Reply by jody anderson September 17, 2010 03:13am PDTReport Abuse

dtzulu- do you know how many fish die from the wound from the hook?

jody anderson

Reply by jody anderson September 17, 2010 03:14am PDTReport Abuse

toni- maybe your slaughterhouse was special- but many slaughterhouses do not work that way

hammer2112

Reply by hammer2112 September 28, 2010 11:38am PDTReport Abuse

I thought this post was about a guy catching fish ...

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 28, 2010 04:59pm PDTReport Abuse

Jodyn Anderson---I can see by your response that u are emotional about all this, and dont know where you get your information on me being a moron. Retired physicist/mathematician Phd here. Not a complete pilgrim. And your doubts about my statement on more trees in Alabama than ever, not my facts, but forestry department facts of the state. I dont have an argument with you, the state does, so no need to attack me, Im not guilty and have no need for a defense. And on the rain forest--You can make any statement you like about that, being the rain forest expert that you appear to be. I cant verify or deny anything you say on that subject, as Ive never been there and dont think there are any rain forests in Alabama.

And if any of you are against hunting, Id like to know why. Hunters spend much more nationally to support game management and wildlife expansion than all the tree huggers put together. And a good hunter always goes for a clean and quick kill and uses almost all of what he kills. Usually the internal organs are left for other wild life, but bones and any scraps, I always feed to my dogs. Skins go for leather, meat is eaten when sliced and tough parts wind up as sausage with spices added.

How much different is that from your ranch raised cattle?
Regards

gerald backus

Reply by gerald backus September 28, 2010 09:39pm PDTReport Abuse

I am against hunting.

First of all I see a large difference between hunting and ranching. On an ideal ranch workers work to provide animals with necessary warmth, relative comfort, food and other necessities. Ideally a ranch first and foremost should be about that, not about producing meat. If ranchers aren't thinking about the welfare of the animals and if they aren't giving the animals the years of life, which God intended for them, I say that they shouldn't even think about procuring meat from the animals. I say that people should only eat meat if the animals are given the conditions and years, which they need.

Without conditions, which humans can provide, animals suffer more in the wild. They starve and suffer from cold and other animals. They are much better off in human made condtions.

Hunting is the lazy man's way to procure food. Hunting animals is bad for the mental culture of human beings and as we all know hunters can't painlessly kill animals every time. So if we are really honest, animals do suffer from hunters. I say either leave the wild animals alone or build conditions for their humane capture and sustainance. After capture, treat them as farm animals (in cages naturally).

jodie urasz

Posted by jodie urasz September 11, 2010 02:28pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

I am constantly amazed at God's creations. I guess if the idea is to use only rod and reel then going really deep isn't possible but think of the variety he's already found. Wow.

I'm wondering if Steve likes to eat fish too. lol

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 11, 2010 04:50pm PDTReport Abuse

feeds it to his cat

haythem

Posted by haythem September 11, 2010 02:35pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

That is not steve wozniac, "the Woz", http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Wozniak

pmarks

Reply by pmarks September 11, 2010 02:55pm PDTReport Abuse

Yes it is the same Steve Wozniac as he is the Northern Californian software company executive featured in the article, and he is "The Woz". and he is a good angler because he returns the fish he catches, except for the large moray eel that exploded in a fit of rage after being hauled aboard the chartered boat off Portugal. There wasn't much he could do about that catch as "El Diablo" the eel had to wear itself out enough to be safely dealt with. I wonder if he and the guide ate it.

zach davis

Reply by zach davis September 11, 2010 03:22pm PDTReport Abuse

not woz... same name, different woz

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 11, 2010 04:51pm PDTReport Abuse

Never heard of an exploding eel. Must be a naval secret.

rick kennerknecht

Posted by rick kennerknecht September 11, 2010 02:53pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Incredible Fishing feat. Congratulations!
Fly Fishing Nut

iamrandyjames

Posted by iamrandyjames September 11, 2010 02:53pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

"Steve Wozniak is arguably the world's most prolific fisherman, having recently attained a milestone that probably will never be matched: 1,000 species of fish landed via rod and reel, after visits to 63 countries and 37 U.S. states, and flying more than one million miles."

You know what it takes to accomplish what this man did? MONEY. That's it!! No talent, no skill, just money!! Hell, if you have enough money, NASA can send you to the friggin moon!

felino jr demeterio

Reply by felino jr demeterio September 11, 2010 04:29pm PDTReport Abuse

YEP. BUT even if you have lots of money, you'll be tanned the whole day fishing at sea without any fish cought. catching fish is a talent. yep money can bring you to the moon, but it needs a skillfull mind to do that or else you'll just remain asleep when your rocket lands on the moon and throw all your money in the outer space. its easier for a talent to create money than a money to doscover a talent.
steve wozniak is indeed a prolific fisherman.

iamrandyjames

Reply by iamrandyjames September 11, 2010 04:59pm PDTReport Abuse

"steve wozniak is indeed a prolific fisherman"...yea, so are the fishing guides he hired for his fishing trips!!!! Yep, anybody who has enough money can go anywhere in the world, hire any guide service and catch fish ANYWHERE!!!!! I won't dissagree that some people are talented in fishing however, I think people who have a lot of money (like wozniak) would rather hire a guide to catch fish than to take the time to become a prolific fisherman. LOL

joe zani

Posted by joe zani September 11, 2010 02:58pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

I'm happy to hear he does catch and release though I hope he takes the hook out and gets them back into the waters real quick .

felino jr demeterio

Reply by felino jr demeterio September 11, 2010 04:30pm PDTReport Abuse

maybe he's not eating fish.

ron harris

Posted by ron harris September 11, 2010 03:06pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Does anyone care? I sure as hell don't. I have caught maybe 10-15 species and i still don't get a Chris Mathew's thrill up my leg. I guess Wozniac does? puhlease, this record and 1 dollar will get you a cup of coffee.

felino jr demeterio

Reply by felino jr demeterio September 11, 2010 04:33pm PDTReport Abuse

every single fish i cought thrilled me up.

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 12, 2010 09:26am PDTReport Abuse

Im with Felino! Im 65 and I think Ive caught 15-20 fish in my life. Hit 2 golf balls too. Had fun every time!!

If Steve wants to fish all over the place, suits me!! Hes doing what congress wants him to do, spread the wealth!! Look at what this must cost him! Great spreading of the wealth all over the world! My hat is off to Steve. Now why anyone would criticize him for having fun is beyond me. Let they guy alone. You would be doing fun things, just like I would, if you could afford it. If he catches moby dick, thats fine too. I couldnt care how many, or where, or when, or how many records he sets, its just a record, who cares about records? They are only important if you want them to be, and most folks dont care about your records. Regards to all.

dtzulu

Reply by dtzulu September 12, 2010 02:09pm PDTReport Abuse

Well said Bill!

beatrice lasoi

Posted by beatrice lasoi September 11, 2010 03:07pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Looks fake

elmosi

Posted by elmosi September 11, 2010 03:13pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

I admire such a pasttime or hobby. Surely it was all done and even meant to be shared. I appreciated reading this article very much. And so should all.

zach davis

Posted by zach davis September 11, 2010 03:21pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

wow, amazing fish, if i ever win the lottery, i will that lead life.... randy james, you are half right, it takes money to fish on that level, lots of money, but do not underestimate the skill and talents involved in deep sea fishing

give catfish noodlin a try! we're viewed as white trash rednecks by many, but not everybody can do it, and i could damn near feed my family all year from it

gerald, god's bounty feeds all of us, as far as the politics goes, my family needs to eat, therefore i grow and i kill, and i brew my own beer to raise my mug in thanks to god's earth for feeding us

pdgirl

Reply by pdgirl September 12, 2010 06:24am PDTReport Abuse

Zach out of all the post on here you my friend speak the truth! God gave us animals of the land to eat not to pet! I have to agree when I become richer than I am now I will also do what Woznack has done! I might not be great like he is but I wanna fish in every state! I am a woman and I have to say my friend noodling is crazy and I will never give it a try! I have seen it done and it takes a man with big balls to stick his hand in a dark hole in the water and not know what is done there!
To everyone of you who throws up the fact Woznack has money don't hate the player hate the game! Get off your butts and make the money he has!

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 12, 2010 09:30am PDTReport Abuse

Im with Pdgirl on that one. Im gonna paddle her boat. Dont give a hoot to fish, but if I can be outdoors, enjoying the sunshine and water, she can do the fishing and Ill have just as much fun smiling!! Good fun and best wishes to all!!

hammer2112

Reply by hammer2112 September 28, 2010 11:47am PDTReport Abuse

I would like to fish in every state also!! My only difference from Wozniak would be to fish for species I could eat, and eat them, within the regulations as allowed. Of course I do catch and release when appropriate, i.e. hooking a trout out of season, or foul hooking salmon. Caught a Ratfish once, definitely released that thing! I don't see the point in going after a rare species that I have no plans on putting on a dinner table. Just a difference in opinion, that's all, nothing more.

brian thorp

Posted by brian thorp September 11, 2010 03:43pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Definitely not the Steve Wozniack from Apple for those that are confused. Google Steve Wozniak and you'll see that it isn't. Apple's Steve Wozniack is 60 years old and looks much different....

maxxfordham

Reply by maxxfordham September 12, 2010 03:10am PDTReport Abuse

Looks like you're even confused about the actual spelling of the name Wozniak (without a c).

brian thorp

Reply by brian thorp September 12, 2010 07:50am PDTReport Abuse

Congratulations on pointing out a typo....

maxxfordham

Reply by maxxfordham September 12, 2010 11:42am PDTReport Abuse

Really? Just a typo? Your fingers just accidentally slipped over and pressed the "c" without you thinking you needed a c there?

I think not. There's a difference between just a typo. and an actual spelling error.

Congratulations on being an idiot.

streamfisher9

Reply by streamfisher9 September 15, 2010 03:58pm PDTReport Abuse

What's your problem, max?

maxxfordham

Reply by maxxfordham September 15, 2010 10:46pm PDTReport Abuse

What do you mean? Why are you asking me instead of brian? I dunno... do YOU have a problem... maybe?

james arnold nogra

Posted by james arnold nogra September 11, 2010 04:38pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

wow... all I can say is wow

dingdong001

Posted by dingdong001 September 11, 2010 05:18pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

I wanna be the very best
Like no one ever was
To catch them is my real test
To train them is my cause

I will travel across the land
Searching far and wide
Teach Pokemon to understand
The power that's inside

Pokemon!
Gotta catch 'em all--
It's you and me
I know it's my destiny
Pokemon!
Ooooh, you're my best friend
In a world we must defend

Pokemon!
Gotta catch 'em all--
Our hearts so true
Our courage will pull us through
You teach me and I'll teach you
Pokemon!

Gotta catch 'em all!
Gotta catch 'em all!
Yeeaa.

joel cieslak

Reply by joel cieslak September 12, 2010 01:30am PDTReport Abuse

XD THANK YOU! He was clearly using Super Rod.

maxxfordham

Reply by maxxfordham September 13, 2010 11:25pm PDTReport Abuse

Heh, Pokemon...

musky hunter

Posted by musky hunter September 11, 2010 06:14pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

next he needs to try and set an real record like this
http://muskie.outdoorsfirst.com/articles/08.18.2010/3293/Marathon.Man.Not.Only.Beats.but.Obliterates.His.Own.Record/index.htm

christine hill

Posted by christine hill September 11, 2010 07:40pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

Fish On, Buddy, Fish On! Congratulations to your amazing milestone! I'm also a catch and release fisherman and as long as you release the animal correctly, the animal will be perfectly fine.

florence assalit

Posted by florence assalit September 11, 2010 08:01pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

How can this man do this, what is proud about? His ego? We need to save our species in the ocean and the land. What an idiot. Poor creatures=-(

pdgirl

Reply by pdgirl September 12, 2010 06:27am PDTReport Abuse

Your the idiot! I am 100 percent sure that he does less harm to animals than your save the plant butt does!

pdgirl

Reply by pdgirl September 12, 2010 06:27am PDTReport Abuse

Your the idiot! I am 100 percent sure that he does less harm to animals than your save the plant butt does!

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 12, 2010 09:38am PDTReport Abuse

Florence, most of us by now, tend to totally ignore and laugh at you pilgrims whose only thrill in life is to point out percieved problems. If you see a problem, be specific and not generalize about it. And at the same time, suggest a realistic solution to get the task done in a better manner. If you dont have a positive suggestion, you are but a bug on our windshield.How was the land damaged here, or the fish killed. Maybe by the drillling holes in the ground to get oil and gas damaged things in your world. But it provides you electricity and transportation, jobs for lots of folks too. How bout if loggers quit cutting trees so you can no longer wipe your ass with toilet paper? You can revert to the old way of doing it with leaves, if there are any where you live, or sand like the indians did in the deserts if thats where you live.

florence assalit

Posted by florence assalit September 11, 2010 08:04pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

I guess I made a mistake, He catches and releases, sorry. Just a touchy subject because our earth is really in peril. Humans should stop disturbing the environment or we might not have one anymore.

hammer2112

Reply by hammer2112 September 11, 2010 10:17pm PDTReport Abuse

Sport anglers are not what is hurting out ocean environments. Commercial fishing by vessels with on board factories is causing the depletion of many once abundant species. Additionally, catch and release is not an acceptable practice for all species in deep water. Take Scup for instance. Many fishing charters will bring their parties over schools are Scup that are caught and rapidly reeled to the surface from deep waters. These fish are not capable of adjusting to the pressure changes this quickly and will damage their internal organs. My opinion, and that of many charter captains is don't fish for it unless you plan on eating it.

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 12, 2010 09:42am PDTReport Abuse

Florence, you need to go fishing and hunting and exploring out doors more often. Go to places where there are no roads, live out in the forest for a couple of weeks, and see what its like away from your tv set. Work on a farm or ranch for 6mo would enlighten you too.

hammer2112

Posted by hammer2112 September 11, 2010 10:22pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

I'm a sportsman, but really don't get the idea of going after different species that are rare, or have no value at the dinner table. What next, tropical fish?

ronski millstone

Posted by ronski millstone September 11, 2010 11:20pm PDTReply | Report Abuse

I am a avide sportsman hunting fishing All of it
and I believe all hunting, fishing should be stoped for 2 years maybe more
And yes open water fishing ,,Comerical ,, should stop for 3 years

bill strickland

Reply by bill strickland September 12, 2010 09:43am PDTReport Abuse

Now?????? Is there a valid reason for that that you forgot to mention to the rest of us, or are you just farting in a hurricane????

Add a Comment

2000 characters left. 2000 total.